27 Sept 2025

The "evolution" of the U.S.S. Enterprise

Is it plausible that the USS Enterprise only gets bigger from ship class to ship class?

An absolutely linear development of the ship's size is implausible for several reasons:

  1. It is mathematically improbable (statistical probability).
  2. For the advancing time (future), this would mean that Starfleet can only build larger.
  3. As time progresses, this would mean that Starfleet would need more and more personnel to handle the tasks at hand. 
  4. Even if the ENTERPRISE were always a long-range research vessel, the technology would be innovative and therefore require less space.

My calculations follow a purely mathematical approach. I do not compare bridge modules or disk heights with each other. I always pull in decks based on the rows of windows and then calculate a physically plausible room height. 

 Size calculations:

ILM Size Chart by Andrew Probert
Old  (official) size charts show the exclusively linear development of the USS Enterprise. Some of them contain incorrect dimensions or incorrect side views.
 
The mathematical reality and also the one on screen often looks different. 
 
 
Commented on this by Bill George of ILM:
"The only description we had at the time was that it was "souped-up" and bigger than the Enterprise. The size the miniature was built to was determined by the camera guys as being the optimal size to shoot. As I recall Nilo [Rodis-Jamero] did that size comparison chart, but it wasn't necessarily followed. The issue of true scale wasn't a consideration. Budget, ease of use, art direction and dramatic intent were what influenced the construction of the ship."